Sunday, 1 January 2017

Libertarian Media of the Year 2016

What a year!  Brexit, Trump and a whole host of world-changing nationalistic events which have made political satire redundant.  Let's look at the tidbits you lovers of libertarian law should have been consuming in your free time during the previously 'current' year.

Book of the year must go to Keir Martland's Political and Cultural Essays, which is really just
'an extension and overhaul of [his] first book', Liberty From A Beginner.  This is an ideal starter for anyone interested in libertarianism.  Keir is sharp, thorough and insightful; I can't rate him highly enough. 
https://thelibertarianalliance.com/2016/11/04/political-and-cultural-essays-by-keir-martland/



The movie with the most outstanding libertarian qualities surely must be Captain America: Civil War.  Captain America and Iron Man come to blows over the centralised power of the UN attempting to take control of the superhero team, the Avengers; Iron Man explains that if they don't sign the accords handed to them, they are 'no better than the bad guys' - what's the difference between an outlaw and a vigilante working outside of the law?  This is of course the struggle all statists must face when confronted with their love of superheroes.  Do we want a strong, Nietzschean ubermensch to come and get shit done or are we too afraid to trust in the goodness of the vast majority of people, even within a homogeneous society, and demand instead that the state micro-manage our interactions?  Captain America is the good guy here and stands firmly on the side of individual sovereignty without losing an inch of the hearty nationalism his character embodies.  When confronted with the authority of the UN, he complains that this is a political organisation run by people with agendas and that shifting the blame to another isn't good enough for him.  He trusts in his own goodness and wants to take responsibility.  To sign, he argues, is to 'surrender our right to choose'.

Civil War is nothing short of a radical stand against globalism and centralised state power.  Captain America as an archetype has been a real hero in the world.  The film is very personal; the villain is a simple man with very personal motives and the clash betweeen Cap and Stark is just as personal.  Captain America must go beyond the law to do what he knows is right and is ultimately proven right.  This is a milestone moral chapter in the West in that we are remembering that one man can be right when the majority and the loudest voices are not.

Image result for captain america libertarianism

(Hunt for the Wilderpeople deserves an honorary mention and is a MUST WATCH!)

TV has been overtaking cinema in its ability to not just impress with high-budget scenes but also to make us think.  Whilst The Walking Dead has continued an anti-coercive theme, one of the best shows of the year is Stranger Things.  Three young school-nerds must go outside of the law to protect a young girl who appears to have been part of some secret, MK-ultra style psy-ops program run by a shady federal outfit in the US; meanwhile, they are trying to find their friend who has.  The local sheriff, who has one of the best mantras ever (mornings are for coffee and contemplation), eventually concludes something is suspcious and also joins the youngsters and others outside of 'the law' - that is, tyrannical legislation.  The show is a heart-warming pastiche of all the elements we loved about children/teen adventure movies as 80's and 90's kids.  The message is similar to Civil War but much more emotional as it's experienced between children and parents.  This show is very cool and very libertarian.

The choice of game pains me but is nonetheless libertarian in its scope and achievement.  Pokemon Go is a worldwide experiment in spontaneous order.  A game is created by augmenting the reality of our world when viewed through the lens of one's phone and players from all around the world have had to organise themselves civilly in order to politely compete to collect small monster and to engage in friendly cock-fights with the monsters they collect.  Moreover, people have opened their homes and businesses to act as gyms and spaces which they virtual world benefits from.

Just recently I was engaged in a 'conversation' about roads etc., as anarchic libertarians such as myself sometimes are.  I tried to explain that the roads here in the UK were developed privately during the Industrial Revolution and the same with the railways in the North-East US.  This did not result in chaos but, rather, different businesses benefitted from co-operating peacably with each other and so did everyone else as a result.  Pokemon Go has go people out of the house, engaging with many others and making the world around a more lively and interesting place; it's not just keeping people fit but reinvigorating a sense of community in its own, small way.  This is essential for helping us understand the pro-social nature of individualism and the ability of our market community to handle organisational issues that arise.

Enjoy these and please offer your thoughts in the comments section.  Happy New Year!


Tuesday, 18 October 2016

My article on Libertarian Nationalism

Alternative Right: CAN'T HAVE LIBERTARIANISM WITHOUT NATIONALISM: Confused multiculturalism seeking the wisdom of nationalism. by Rik Storey
On the anniversary of 9/11, President Obama called fo...

Monday, 17 October 2016

Right-Libertarian: Sorry, National Socialism

Recently, Seventh Son at therightstuff.biz has been trashing national socialism's only friend in the alt-right – right-libertarianism/anarcho-capitalism. They have declared libertarianism to be a fundamentally Jewish ideology and, thus, all libertarians are Jews and, thus, great deceivers. They have reiterated the trustworthy sentiment of the neocons - that libertarianism is egalitarian and anti-hierarchy, like Marxism. As such, they have labelled us 'cucks'. Furthermore, they have reminded us that the socio-biological obstacles to achieving a libertarian society are such that it is entirely unrealistic to expect one, except through national socialism as a stepping stone. I would therefore like to tell the national socialists that I am sorry:

I am sorry you have decided to turn your sights at your only true ally in the fight against cultural Marxism at such a crucial time, when the very future of Western civilization hangs in the balance and her enemies overwhelm us. I am sorry you have betrayed not just those of another ideology but your very kin in doing so.

I am sorry that you were unaware that libertarianism is in fact a theory of law, is not synonymous with Austrian Economics, and in no way precludes nationalism. I am sorry that you had no idea that right or paleo-libertarians believe in a natural order and, thus, in hierarchies which organically arise. I am sorry that you do not know that libertarian aristocracies were the way of the Indo-Europeans from whom we are descended and whom you are supposed to venerate; those who gave birth to the individualism and libertarian streak which has uniquely run through Western civilization's history.

I am sorry that you do not see that your own ideology of socialism does in actual fact originate with Jewish thinkers, making you hypocrites, or that it is a fundamentally leftist ideology, putting you in no position to throw around accusations of cuckery. I am sorry that you more highly prize the Prussian Socialism of Spengler (which merely adapted leftism to focus on race rather than class) than the ways of your ancestors and the natural order of European peoples. I am sorry that you like Hitler a great deal but fail to recognise that his politics were no more a part of Western tradition than his vegetarianism.

I am sorry that you think the establishment of a Nazi regime in the US is more realistic than achieving a natural order through reforming the monarchies of Europe, following the wave of nationalism currently sweeping the continent. I am sorry you fail to recognise that there are vast swathes of degenerates who happen to be white in the US and could never maintain the sort of socialism that the Germans were able to in the 1930's and the Nordics (decreasingly so) since the 1970's. And I am sorry that you fail to recognise that your only hope to ever see your ideal system would be within the sort of covenant communities proposed by the only people who tolerate you – your now spurned friends, the right-libertarians.

If you would like to make amends (and I sincerely hope you do), I would recommend you first read Hoppe's Democracy: The God That Failed, Duchesne's The Uniqueness of Western Civilization and my own articles re the historicity of libertarianism in Western civilization, especially Northern European civilizations.

Oh, finally, I am not at all sorry for being facetious.