Wednesday, 14 September 2016

I'm back, like Optimus Prime, and I've been busy

I told you I'd be back!

Here's my weekly news breakdown and a discussion of what I've been doing.  Stay tuned for my behind the scenes look at the Property and Freedom Society 2016 held in Bodrum, Turkey; also my podcast is soon due to be broadcast over at ProudBoy Magazine.  I'm pleased to say my articles have been doing well there, especially this response to Prof. Obioma's article in Foreign Policy about why there are no successful black nations.


Sunday, 28 August 2016

Apologies For Podcast Delays

I apologise to my viewers who have not seen my weekly podcast for the past fortnight.  I have been busy starting a new job, writing articles for ProudBoy Magazine and conducting some interviews with other sources.  Please check out the Propertarian Institute's podcast to hear a discussion with Curt Doolittle and stay tuned for a behind the scenes look at the Property and Freedom Society of Hans-Hermann Hoppe.  Like Optimus Prime, I will return; for now, sorry.

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

ProudBoy Magazine launches and yours truly is a columnist

Finally, ProudBoy Magazine has been unleashed and yours truly is a columnist.  The brainchild of comedian and commentator, Gavin McInnes, the theme is the promotion of libertarianism and 'Western Chauvinism'.

So far my articles have been defending the white middle class from attacks by the left.  Some articles will be more comedic and ranty, such as my article about why Star Trek Beyond thought it was necessary was to make Sulu gay and have an on-screen kiss, despite George Takei's protestations; some will be more serious, such as my interview with Prof. Richard Lynn on John McAfee's declaration that libertarians should be ashamed that over 90% of us are white.  Be sure to check the site every week for fresh articles; here is my author's page.

In other news, in the past fortnight I have started a weekly transatlantic news commentary from an anarcho-libertarian perspective.  Please check it out.

Keep supporting my work by liking, sharing, subscribing etc. etc. Every little helps.  Many thanks to my core readers and viewers for the encouragement.




Tuesday, 12 July 2016

The Libertarian View of Immigration and Borders

Please check out my article over at the Council of European Canadians' blog Ocean Drive on the debate among libertarians as to whether we should support open borders or greater regulation.  The answer is: the third option!

Here is an extract of my interview with Walter Block which inspired this article:


Monday, 27 June 2016

Goodbye, EU. Hello, the European.

First, I must apologise to you, my core audience, for the month-long break I have taken since my last post and video before my Brexit interviews; I have moved - moved country!  I have come to the beautiful peninsula of Bodrum, home to some of the greatest ancient Greek thinkers and the birthplace of many great ideas which galvanized the development of the West.  If I may digress a little further, this place is renowned for stealing the hearts of its visitors, as it did mine, not least because of its uniquely arresting bays and coves, and dry warmth softened by gentle breezes, but also because of the history of the place, e.g. the ruin of one of the seven ancient wonders of the world - the tomb of Mausolus, from which we derive our word mausoleum.  What is more, Bodrum is the meeting place of the Property and Freedom Society, baby of the greatest Libertarian philosopher of our time, Hans-Hermann Hoppe.  One can see why and I will make it my job to provide you with a first-hand look in good time...

But, to the point at hand: I was not the only one who left Europe, so to speak.  Though I left the territories called European, the United Kingdom left the centralized, protectionist European Union.  Not moments after the votes had been counted in favour of the 'leavers', the threats of economic apocalypse came.  Britain would sink beneath the waves; however, such talk was followed not only by the US, Canadian and especially the German governments saying they want to continue strong trading relationships, but European right-wing parties immediately voiced a desire for similar referendums (N.B. not referenda).  Scotland, which voted with a majority in favour of remaining will now most likely have another referendum as to seceding from the UK, London too would seem as though it would wish to secede as a city-state from the rest of England; on and on the secesssion must go, for this is the way of the West.

There can be no middle-ground between individualism and collectivism and the West, because of the foundations of our cultures and the interaction between this and our biology has led to the favouring of individualism, especially in the Anglo-Dutch world.  Nature presents us with a battlefield over resources and our genes determine overwhelmingly which side we are on - the strong middle and higher classes or, rather, the capitalist class; or those without, who are incentivised to push the irrational slave ethic of socialism, using coercive power to violate the private property rights of those with.  Secession is a victory for the capitalist class, those who choose to recognise private property rights and have no biological incentive to wish them away.  Its logical conclusion is the secession of all indviduals from any coercive power and, as such, would be the greatest thing ever to happen to those less fortunate.  I feel justified in my optimism, the market shall prevail over all unsustainable political projects, and what is the market but the realm of individual choice.  We have seen this week, a huge victory on the side of the market and those who excel in it for the benefit of all.  But, the war is not over.  Wherever we can, we must push for greater secession and dispel the illusion of the benevolence and legitimacy of an untouchable corporate body called 'the state' until all that is left is individual actors, using means to achieve ends, not one of them mysteriously immune from justice.

The battle will be fierce.  Even now exaggerations are made, such as that leave-campaigning politicians lied to coerce voters their way and that they are now backtracking - an easy thing to do when only one side of the story is sought.  The weak-minded are swayed by such propaganda and have suddenly 180'd to hypocritical desires to retrospectively tweak democracy (the god which has failed again but which cannot be directly spoken ill of).  Be sure that the political class will continue to catastrophise and declare Brexit the root of all evil.  We, who want freedom, must be equipped with the facts and be ready to defend this secession and indeed all secession.  We must be the optimists and we must shine a light of truth so that the path to freedom can be made visible to others.  The enemies of freedom will not be merciful when they cast up smoke and mirrors.  Fight on, a new enlightenment and a brighter future await.

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

Optimism about Aritificial Intelligence and the Future

Hunter Hastings discussed with me the brilliant innovations in the market to develop AI for the assistance of consumers.  Also, the abilities of what he describes as the cognitive assistant will  probably revolutionize the activities of entrepreneurs, not just by connecting individuals, but by providing people with information, skills and opportunities they would not have otherwise.

Hunter provides brilliant examples of how AI is changing our lives for the better right now, even saving lives!  Also discussed are irrational fears for the future and the hope of the reduction of state activities as individualism increases dramatically, people's unique abilities being enhanced and made more marketable.  For such reasons, Hunter describes AI as the 'augmented individual'.

All this and more:

Thursday, 28 April 2016

David Gordon's conversation with Murray Rothbard about Argumentation Ethics

The following is an excerpt from an interview I conducted with David Gordon, editor of the Mises Review:



RS: Would you mind if I queried you a little bit about argumentation ethics?  I must confess I’m very enamoured with it; I think it’s fascinating, especially having a legal background.  I’m very interested in Stephan Kinsella, who has developed this in terms of its application to jurisprudence.  I’ve also written on the subject of holding state judicial powers accountable under a private law system and how the state can never lawfully be a judge and could be taken to court for aggressively establishing a judicial monopoly.  What are your thoughts on argumentation ethics?

DG: I’m afraid I’m going to be disappointing, I think there’s something to it but I have difficulty seeing exactly what.  One of the points is: suppose I were to say, I don’t own myself.  I would be involved in some sort of contradiction because in order to say, 'I don’t own myself,' I show that, in fact, I did own myself.  Suppose I say in English, 'I’ve never spoken an English sentence in my life'; my saying just that shows that my statement is false.  Therefore, the claim is that it’s a similar type of profound contradiction.  The problem is: I just do not see what the contradiction is supposed to be.  If I can tell you a funny story, I was talking to Rothbard and I said, 'What if someone just said “I just can’t see what the contradiction is?” and he said, ‘Ah, f**k ‘em!’  There may be something to it and maybe I’m just failing to see it.