My article on Libertarian Nationalism

Alternative Right: CAN'T HAVE LIBERTARIANISM WITHOUT NATIONALISM: Confused multiculturalism seeking the wisdom of nationalism. by Rik Storey
On the anniversary of 9/11, President Obama called fo...

Right-Libertarian: Sorry, National Socialism

Recently, Seventh Son at therightstuff.biz has been trashing national socialism's only friend in the alt-right – right-libertarianism/anarcho-capitalism. They have declared libertarianism to be a fundamentally Jewish ideology and, thus, all libertarians are Jews and, thus, great deceivers. They have reiterated the trustworthy sentiment of the neocons - that libertarianism is egalitarian and anti-hierarchy, like Marxism. As such, they have labelled us 'cucks'. Furthermore, they have reminded us that the socio-biological obstacles to achieving a libertarian society are such that it is entirely unrealistic to expect one, except through national socialism as a stepping stone. I would therefore like to tell the national socialists that I am sorry:

I am sorry you have decided to turn your sights at your only true ally in the fight against cultural Marxism at such a crucial time, when the very future of Western civilization hangs in the balance and her enemies overwhelm us. I am sorry you have betrayed not just those of another ideology but your very kin in doing so.

I am sorry that you were unaware that libertarianism is in fact a theory of law, is not synonymous with Austrian Economics, and in no way precludes nationalism. I am sorry that you had no idea that right or paleo-libertarians believe in a natural order and, thus, in hierarchies which organically arise. I am sorry that you do not know that libertarian aristocracies were the way of the Indo-Europeans from whom we are descended and whom you are supposed to venerate; those who gave birth to the individualism and libertarian streak which has uniquely run through Western civilization's history.

I am sorry that you do not see that your own ideology of socialism does in actual fact originate with Jewish thinkers, making you hypocrites, or that it is a fundamentally leftist ideology, putting you in no position to throw around accusations of cuckery. I am sorry that you more highly prize the Prussian Socialism of Spengler (which merely adapted leftism to focus on race rather than class) than the ways of your ancestors and the natural order of European peoples. I am sorry that you like Hitler a great deal but fail to recognise that his politics were no more a part of Western tradition than his vegetarianism.

I am sorry that you think the establishment of a Nazi regime in the US is more realistic than achieving a natural order through reforming the monarchies of Europe, following the wave of nationalism currently sweeping the continent. I am sorry you fail to recognise that there are vast swathes of degenerates who happen to be white in the US and could never maintain the sort of socialism that the Germans were able to in the 1930's and the Nordics (decreasingly so) since the 1970's. And I am sorry that you fail to recognise that your only hope to ever see your ideal system would be within the sort of covenant communities proposed by the only people who tolerate you – your now spurned friends, the right-libertarians.

If you would like to make amends (and I sincerely hope you do), I would recommend you first read Hoppe's Democracy: The God That Failed, Duchesne's The Uniqueness of Western Civilization and my own articles re the historicity of libertarianism in Western civilization, especially Northern European civilizations.

Oh, finally, I am not at all sorry for being facetious.

Paleo-Libertarianism and the Heresies to the Natural Order

No Social Contract in Anglo-Saxon Common Law

Recently, a chum asked me, 'So is the Common Law the fabled "social contract"?'

My response:

'Not quite. Anglo-Saxon Common Law predates the Norman Conquest and was written down in Anglo-Saxon and not Latin. It is one of those germanic bodies of law which was devised privately when rights were based on kinship, i.e. folk right. As such, its basis is in the libertarian aristocracy practised by the Anglo-Saxon nobility, descended from the same Indo-European practice. It was upon this that English Common Law developed. Sadly, but to a lesser extent than other germanic law systems, this was intermingled with Roman Law which was fundamentally statist despite also being developed by private bodies. This was merged with Anglo-Saxon law to become what we know as English Common Law which is, most significantly, the system the US legal system is based upon. Thus, Burke's 'ancient constitution' or 'ancient rights and liberties' of the Englishman and every Englishman's home being his castle.'

Iron Man vs. Trump, #BLM riots and Brexit legal quagmire