Sunday, 15 November 2015

What I Love/Hate About Conspiracy Theories



Questioning anyone or anything that claims to be an authority and challenging the status quo are great western traditions and are these are in sad decline as the ridiculous ideology of political correctness grows in popularity.  I love the fact that people can recognise that there is something fundamentally wrong with the way we do society.  That’s why the classic sci-fi film, The Matrix, struck such a chord with the audience, particularly the line, ‘there's something wrong with the world.  You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad.’  Sure, asking questions is good but, just as important, is where you get your answers from.  What is your source?  What I hate about conspiracy theories is that, as a Libertarian, I am often compared to one.  I am one who wants to be well-equipped with knowledge of government activity to maintain what liberties I have from further encroachments and hopefully even to see the tide turned against state coercion.  However, when conspiracy theorists theorise, they typically consult two kinds of poor source material: 1. a mystical sage; or 2. some ideologue with an axe to grind.

Let’s start by examining the sage: David Icke, whilst he appears to be about as sincere as someone who at one time claimed to be the return of the Messiah can be, he expects us to believe that the world is controlled by lizard people.  Automatically, one would have to wonder why the elite of the world are trying to stem global warming; lizards like it hot!  If your theory included penguin people, then you might have me curious.  But where does he get his information from?  A spirit guide; that is, voices in his head which he claims to be benevolent aliens.  Other people claim that the world is controlled by Satanists and, again, they can tend to have purely mystical sources.  What this does is makes another human being your source of truth.  As soon as you create some sage with authority, they can insist that you believe things that defy empirical evidence and that you do things which defy your conscience and rationale.  This phenomenon doesn’t just affect conspiracy theorists but is how entire religions and societies function today.

Now, let’s look at the second poor source used by conspiracy theorists – ideologists spreading propaganda.  For example, many truly believe there is firm evidence that the Illuminati control the world, the Illuminati being anything from satanic cabals to lizard aliens (or more likely penguins).

The origin of the conspiracy theory that the Illuminati survived being disbanded by the Bavarian government in 1785 lies ultimately with a French Jesuit priest, Augustin Barruel.  Life had become increasingly difficult for Catholicism in France during the Revolution.  Barruel fled France and found safety in England.  With militaristic Jesuitical zeal, he wrote against Napoleon and the Revolution and sought to turn the British against the French, hoping Rome’s enemies would eventually come to war.
As well as popularising theories about the Knights Templar, Barruel wrote Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism in 1797.  He postulated that the Illuminati had continued, despite evidence to the contrary, and were working through Freemasonry in a conspiracy to establish governments which were antimonarchical as well as anticlerical, representing a threat to remaining monarchies of Europe.  It was soon translated into English, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian etc. and became a transnational sensation.  Even political figures began to take the claims seriously and public discussion became so unavoidable that Freemasons from across Europe began writing openly in their defence against the theory.

The reality is that there was not any organised force behind the enlightenment or the genuine desire to be free from oppression, whether it be religious or otherwise.
As men became better educated during the Enlightenment and the Renaissance, the desire was for a separation of church and state and, furthermore, to question whether we should separate the state from ourselves while we are at it.  This was not brought about by any secret society but by the public at large.  The greatest evidence for this was the birth of Classical Liberalism and the founding of the United States of America.

Sadly, at exactly the same time, a Roman Catholic monk and secret agent, Alexander Horn, who hated the French Revolution and the demise of his hope for a Holy Roman Empire, personally provided the material for Scots Professor John Robison to write Proofs of a Conspiracy against All the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the Secret Meetings of the Free Masons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies.  Robison’s book was equally successful and influential, despite the highly questionable source of these ideas.  In fact, an American pastor sent a copy to President George Washington to learn his thoughts on the matter, to which he responded: 

            It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic   Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.
George Washington could see that the Secularist and/or Classical Liberal principles were not unique to any secret society but were principles held to by many individuals and organisations and even expressed by the principles of liberty in the United States Constitution. 

All the secondary sources used to supposedly prove the conspiracy theories about the Illuminati, such as Nesta Webster and William Guy Carr’s books, base their theories of the above two primary sources!  Are these sources reliable?  Obviously not, yet these and similar conspiracy theories abound.  If we want to discover the truth and not be swayed by some sage or someone with an axe to grind against some other group, we have to do our research.  As a parent, I know we don’t all have the luxury of time to do our own research and so it is important that we only defer to those who sources and material are reviewed by various independent bodies of other researchers and where healthy debate in that field of research is the norm.

A good place to start on the subject of Illuminati conspiracy theories might be the book Conspiracy in the French Revolution from Manchester University Press.  Because, come on, all the universities of the world can’t have been taken over by penguins.  Everyone knows that they’ve been taken over by the Communists.